Research paper
AUTHORS
- Institute of Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, 1254 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA
Abstract
Temporary tinnitus is a common consequence of noise exposure, and may share important mechanisms with chronic tinnitus.
Noise-induced hearing loss is the most prevalent cause of chronic tinnitus.
The reversibility of temporary tinnitus
offers some practical experimental advantages.
We therefore adapted a
behavioral method based on gap detection to measure temporary tinnitus
following brief acoustic trauma.
Although anesthesia is often used
during acoustic trauma exposure, many anesthetics can protect against
noise-induced hearing loss.
Whether anesthesia during acoustic trauma
affects temporary tinnitus therefore remains an open question that directly affects experimental design in tinnitus studies.
Here we tested whether anesthetizing rats with isoflurane during trauma had any effect on tinnitus.
We found that gap-detection deficits, a behavioral measure of tinnitus,
were 5 times stronger and lasted 10 times longer when isoflurane was
not used.
This suggests that isoflurane largely prevents temporary
noise-induced tinnitus.
Highlights
► We used a behavioral gap-detection method to measure temporary tinnitus
in rats following brief acoustic trauma.
► We tested whether
anesthetizing rats with isoflurane during trauma had any effect on on tinnitus.
► We found that tinnitus
was 5 times stronger and lasted 10 times longer when isoflurane was not
used.
► These results suggest that isoflurane largely prevents
temporary noise-induced tinnitus.
Figures and tables from this article:
Fig. 1.
Gap
detection measure of temporary tinnitus. a) Example of startle
responses (arrows) of an animal to a white noise burst embedded in
background narrow-band noise. Top panel shows the startle response to
the noise burst presented in isolation (black lines: 20 individual
trials; red line: mean across trials; grey line: stimulus). Stimulus is
clipped. Bottom panel shows that the startle response is reduced when
the white noise burst is preceded by a 50 ms gap in the background
noise. Startle response amplitude is in arbitrary units. b) Peak startle
response amplitudes for the raw data shown in (a). Black circles: 20
individual trials; grey dots: mean across trials; *indicates that the
gap caused a significant decrease in peak startle amplitude (p < 10−2). The decreased startle response demonstrates successful gap detection by the animal, with a tinnitus index (see Methods)
of 0.0002 (i.e., no tinnitus). c) Schematic of time course for a
typical experiment (G: gap detection task, N: noise detection task.
Blocks of tasks were repeated (indicated by…) until performance returned
to baseline. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this
figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this
article.)
Fig. 2. Isoflurane blocks temporary tinnitus. a) Time course of temporary tinnitus following brief noise trauma. Animals (n = 10)
were not anesthetized with isoflurane during pure-tone trauma. Note
that tinnitus index rose sharply after trauma and remained elevated for
hours. Symbols in a, b, e, f indicate different animals. b) Time course
of tinnitus when animals were anesthetized with isoflurane during noise
trauma. These are the same 10 animals as in (a), but tested at least 2
days apart. c) The maximum tinnitus index was significantly greater when
isoflurane was not used (p < 10−2). d) Tinnitus duration was significantly longer when isoflurane was not used (p < 0.05).
Tinnitus duration was defined as the amount of time that the tinnitus
index exceeded 0.05. e) A reduction in %GPIAS (consistent with presence
of tinnitus) showed a similar time course as the increase in tinnitus
index in (a) for animals not anesthetized with isoflurane during trauma.
f) Animals anesthetized during trauma showed no reduction in %GPIAS. g)
The maximal change in %GPIAS from baseline was significantly greater
when isoflurane was not used (p < 10−2). Error bars in c, d, g indicate standard errors of the mean.
Fig. 3. Narrow
band noise detection thresholds. a) Example of startle responses of an
animal to a white noise burst without any background noise. In the top
panel, the white noise burst is presented in isolation. In the lower
panels, the burst is preceded by a narrow-band prepulse, with the
prepulse level indicated at left (prepulse bandwidth was ⅓ octave and
center frequency was 6 kHz). Note that the startle response was
progressively reduced as the prepulse level was increased. Startle
response amplitude is in arbitrary units. b) Peak startle response
amplitudes for the raw data shown in (a). Black circles: 20 individual
trials; grey filled circles: mean across trials; *indicates that the
prepulse caused a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in peak
startle amplitude. We used the lowest prepulse level that significantly
reduced startle as an estimate (upper bound) of detection threshold
(50 dB in this example). c) Time course of detection threshold,
expressed as dB relative to the background noise level used in the gap
detection task. Detection threshold averaged −19 ± 6 dB and never
exceeded −5 dB, indicating that animals could always hear the background
noise used in the gap detection task.
- Corresponding author.
- Fuente:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario